Why Do Most Companies Fail Spectacularly When They Switch to Microservices?
Microservices can complicate everything. They bring big challenges to companies.
Switching to microservices isn’t always a magic fix. Adding new features can take longer than expected. Services split across many codebases make tracking tough.
The architecture becomes complex and hard to manage. Code reviews turn into detailed and time-consuming tasks. A simple change in one service can break another.
Testing becomes daunting and overwhelming.
Teams often struggle with tangled dependencies. Many fail to fully decouple services, leading to confusion.
Microservices can create more problems than they solve. To handle this better, companies must be smart.
Start by ensuring the core architecture can scale. Don’t rush into microservices too quickly.
Focus on reducing dependencies before making the switch. If one engineer can’t explain the whole feature flow, rethink your approach.
Start small and learn as you go.
Track how your system evolves over time. If complexity increases without clear gains, it’s time to rethink your strategy.
Microservices can add layers of difficulty. Without a solid design and a ready team, they can cause more harm than good.
Be cautious with this approach. Choose wisely and plan well.
How Can Focusing on Architecture and Data Improve Operational Efficiency?
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Snippets of Text to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.